Our post-application consultation has resulted in significant numbers of comments, which have been submitted to Buckinghamshire Council.  Most were supportive comments - 155, but 3 were objections and 2 were neutral comments. 

The map below shows the approximate location of where the 155 support letters comefrom.  We thank everyone for their continued participation in the consultation.

If you wish to submit any comments to Buckinghamshire Council, whether that is support, objection or neutral comments, please click here.

These plans promote green energy, which we are committed to support, and should do
Anything to save energy and cut waste is welcome.
These plans further those goals.
This is a logical way to cut waste, and therefore cut CO2 and costs.
Necessary extra energy storage for UK
I support the use of green energy for the area
We definitely need more green energy - which this will support.
Good to store green energy that would otherwise be wasted
I support this in principle, as we need more green energy.

We need the landscaping aspects, as this is a beautiful area, and I welcome the conservation.
I support this investment - as it cuts wasted energy; good for the environment, and bills.
I support renewal energy and landscape is important
I support this green energy plan.
Maintaining the public access is welcome, and important to me.
I used to go walking there with my children (picnics, nature etc).
I agree that as a country we need to invest on natural energy resources
This would be a way to store such
We all need to contribute to the environment.
Also, the jobs are welcome.
We really need to use more green energy.
This is a beautiful area, so I welcome the landscaping aspects, which I trust will be enforced.
Good idea - we need to use more green energy, not waste it.

I like the landscaping proposal - it's important for the countryside.
I support green energy plans, including this.

It must be landscaped to be sympathetic to the countryside.
I am behind net zero, supporting green energy, and so I support this investment.
It's good for future generations.
I support clean energy
The planting of trees and hedges is welcome, to reduce visual impact
I like the idea of cutting waste, so this is a good idea.

I'm passionate about the countryside and wildlife. Therefore, the tree and hedge planting is important to me, and I welcome that.
It is logical to use energy that is currently wasted.
Great way to cut waste and benefit locals.
I support sustainability projects, and I like this green energy proposal.
I like the landscaping
This is a good way to get more green energy.
These proposals cut wasted energy, and so are welcome.

I like the landscaping and also the grant of £500k.

More trees is good.
It's a good way to use more green energy.

The landscaping is important and welcome.
This is a double benefit - green energy and landscaping with public access.
This is a good advanced way to use electricity more efficiently.
This is a good way to use more green energy.
Promises must be kept to bring it to fruition.
We need more green energy (especially from wind)
It's common sense to use energy that is currently produced but wasted. It's better planning.
I am drawn to the green energy aspect of this plan, which I support.
I support this plan to use more green energy.
This plan cuts waste.
The landscaping is important to me.
I'm in full support of this application.
We need to store energy and then use it.
We need more clean energy.
I'm a strong supporter of green energy, so I support this plan.
(We need green power, recycling etc. for future generations.)
We need green energy such as this.

The landscaping is welcome, as it is important to me that the countryside is conserved.
It's a good way to manage renewable power.
I prefer green energy to fossil fuels as we need to reduce CO2.
The UK should use more green energy in this way.
We must use more green energy (to protect future generations).
It's a good way to save, then use, clean energy.
The landscaping is a good idea.
I like the green energy aspect and the cutting of waste. I support this plan.
We need to use more green energy.
Stored of green energy is essential no point harnessing the green energy if we can't store it.
It's a good way to use clean energy.
This is a good way to help combat climate change.
The public access is a good idea.
My kids have been walking there, & it is important to keep the access and to support nature.
It's a logical way to manage energy better & thus cut costs and CO2.
We do need to use more green energy, such as this.
Electricity demand is rising and has to be met.
Please ensure that HGV's etc. are well managed during installation. Our roads have been made busy and dirty by HS2.
We need to use more clean energy, and this plan facilitates that.
Cutting carbon/waste.
Supporting green energy. Being able to store electricity.
Anything that conserves the environment - such as this - is welcome.
The site is quite isolated and we need green energy.
I like the landscaping proposals.
This green energy project will cut waste, and therefore help keep bills down, which is important to many households.
We need green energy.
The support for wildlife is important to me, so I welcome that.
Will manage green energy more efficiently
This is a good way to harvest green energy.
(Please consider charging EV's on site if technically possible.)
I'm in favour of green energy, which this plan supports.
We do need to use more green energy, for the benefit of the environment.
(I hope the council will inquire about the method of disposal at end-of-life.)
This project cuts waste, which is a good idea.
It will help cut CO2 and bills.
I love the countryside. I support this proposal to make use of green energy.
The landscaping proposals are central to my thoughts.
The plans must be implemented, and I look forward to more trees and plants.
It's good to use up wasted energy.
Needed to best use wind power etc
This is a good way to cut waste and therefore cut costs.
This is a good way to manage green energy (by cutting waste).
It's a good way for the council to support green policies.
I like that
1) It supports green energy
2) It should serve to cut waste and bring bills down.
I support this green energy.
I support this project to promote efficiency.
I support this plan to cut carbon and cut costs (and bills).
This will be needed in the future and is positive with its landscaping and location to towns.
This seems like a necessary proposal and it is well landscaped.
This is a necessary idea - which will utilise an area of land for positive local needs - as we have consistent blackouts!
I support green energy and the need to not lose it if we have blackouts.
We have energy storage and solar so we know it works and is needed.
The £500k fund will help the local area through conservation of the local environment - which I find very important.
The improvements to the local environment and right of way is important.
I also have solar and battery storage so understand its importance.
It will create new jobs in the local area - which we need!
This idea will help with our transition to a Net Zero future - which I believe we need for our children, grandchildren and future generations.
This would be good especially with the £500k fund for conservation and protecting the environment
We currently have HS2 in our back garden, yet no one asked us.
You are asking and I support this as it is good for the future.
This is an idea that will be useful for future generations - especially with the transition to Net Zero!
There will be no adverse impacts on environment in our area.
The need for more opportunities for storing energy
We need to find a pathway to Net Zero and it helps us as a local area.
Good for area and new ideas for storing energy.
The use of the £500k fund will be a positive to the local area as it helps with our environment.
There is a need for new solutions to energy.
There is a need in our local area to find new ways of storing and creating energy and this is a viable solution.
The local area suffers from blackouts and is continuing to expand with new housing so this will be needed.
This is a necessary step for the future of renewable energy in our area.
I support this proposal as it will not affect the local environment and will support the development of renewable energy.
The use of a £500k fund could be beneficial to our natural environment and landscape.
This will allow us to not waste energy.
We need ways of helping with future sources and containers for new energies
There is a need for renewable protections and energy like this that doesn't waste it
It is a good idea as it makes sure we do not waste energy in the area - as we need more investment!
This is a good idea for our area to save energy, when wind turbines turn off.
This would be a good idea for the future of energy.
The need for uses of land outside of housing is a good thing
This is a much needed idea in our area and across the country.
I work in renewables and know this first hand
We need new forms of infrastructure & investment in our local area - which this provides alongside the £500k fund.
This would be a good use of the land for the future
The need for wildlife and the natural environment to be protected & enhanced is imperative - which this does!
This will be good as it is landscaped and helps us not waste energy.
No issues with the proposal as it is needed with increased demand
The fund to help conservation is positive for the area.
The local area needs to invest in new infrastructure & energy to deal with increased demand.
The use of landscaping around the site to make it less of an eyesore and will help us locally are two good reasons.
I support green energy and all solutions around it that will help future generations
The need for renewable energy in the local area as it will be beneficial.
Our area needs investment in vital infrastructure and conservation - which this both does effectively
It feels like a positive progression for the area to utilise renewable energy resources.
This application will help increase investment into renewables and our ecological future - which I am in favour of
We need new investment especially in our conservation
As a father, I am aware that we need new opportunities for employment in our local area in the realms of renewable energy
The local area needs some new ideas for the future and deliver progress which this will be able to do for our future!
The use of a fund for local conservation is good for our environment.
Good for the future of energy use near me
We use solar energy on our home and we recognise the need to have investments into the energies of the future.
I believe that we need to start 'moving with the times' and investing in our communities and supporting projects which help us all.
Do it as it could help the future generations.
This is a good idea to protect us from blackouts and not waste energy.
The local area needs new investment into renewable energies and storage and this is a great way of doing it
The concept of the area being well landscaped so it will prevent it being overwhelmingly visible is a bonus for our area.
Good for the future of energy needs in the our area
The area needs some new infrastructure and investment into energies - which this will do.
There is a need for future uses of land outside of housing.
The local area suffers from occasional blackouts so having an alternative supply of energy is necessary to prevent that
The use of a conservation fund will be good for natural environment.
Good for future and protection of landscaping and walkways.
The creation of a new conservation fund in the local area will help with protecting wildlife.
We need more green energy like this.
Also, it's preferable to permanent buildings (it's only 40 years).
Good way to cut CO2
I've studied green energy and believe this needed for adoption of more renewable energies.
Being energy secure is key for the UK.
This plan will reduce waste and help cut carbon (and bills!)
It makes sense to store and use the electricity rather than waste it. It's good for secure supplies, and cutting carbon.
This is a good way to utilise more green energy (in line with official policy).
This is a common sense way to cut waste and achieve the goal of reducing CO2.
The landscaping proposals are welcome. We need to keep the rural atmosphere.
We do need more electricity as demand rises.
I believe this will cut waste and cut carbon, which is welcome.
These proposals will cut waste and reduce carbon. The isolated site is appropriate.
I oppose net zero policy, which is over zealous.
However, if we have renewables - as we do - these batteries are a good way to balance supply and demand, & cut waste (& use what is currently wasted).
I see the advantages of green energy like this.
It cuts carbon and cuts bills.
(I look forward to getting solar panels myself.)
These proposals will save energy and be good for the environment.
We do require more energy - more green energy, so that is welcome.
I am concerned about our countryside and landscape - so promises about landscaping are good, but must be enforced.
(Conditions agreed by officers and committee must not be watered down; please serve residents and keep any pledges.)
We need electricity, and this will help.
Green energy is better than non-green.
Reducing our reliance on fossil fuels is vital for a sustainable future
My main concern is the environment - the green energy, and landscaping, are attractive to me.
I understand the renewables sector and support these batteries to access green energy.
The landscaping has to be sympathetic to the location.
(I trust that officers, and consultees such as the fire service, will achieve the highest standards of safety and this will be MONITORED regularly)
This is a good way to cut wasted energy and to cut carbon.
We do need more green energy.
It is crazy to pay to close down wind power. Let's use that energy (later) and cut costs.
The promises on investment and landscaping are fine, but of course must be delivered.
We need more energy infrastructure.
The countryside is beautiful in this area, so please be sure to do the landscaping

 



<< Back to home page